Legal Opinion
Mark B. v. County of Onondaga
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion seeking dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a). The allegation that defendant intentionally ignored a known hazard does not bring the case within the “intentional injury” exception to the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Law (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 11; Acevedo v Consolidated Edison Co., 189 AD2d 497, 500-501, lv dismissed 82 NY2d 748; Briggs v Pymm Thermometer Corp., 147 AD2d 433, 435; Ferrara v American ACMI, 122 AD2d 930, 931; Finch v Swingly, 42…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Finch v. SwinglyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Acevedo v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Briggs v. Pymm Thermometer Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Ferrara v. American ACMIAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Patterson v. ArmyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morales v. Arrowood Indem. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022