Legal Opinion

Lemar v. United States

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided February 8, 1984No. 82-2817-M, 83-2403-MPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McRAE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq., for injuries received by their daughter, Sarah Lemar, after she was immunized against various diseases. The government has moved to dismiss, Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6), or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, Fed.R. Civ.P. 56.

Alice and Brian Lemar, at the recommendation of their pediatrician, took their daughter, Sarah, to be immunized at a local school. The immunizations were performed by personnel of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Patentas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Viola Moody (84-5479), George D. Bawgus (84-5695) v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Flake v. Alper Holdings USA, Inc. (In Re Alper Holdings USA, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. Gaines v. Excel Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API