Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Ragen

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 17, 1949No. 49 C 47PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is an action under the Civil Rights Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 43, brought on behalf of the plaintiffs and all others similarly situated. Plaintiffs are all inmates of State penitentiaries — two at Stateville and one at Menard. They allege that the rights and privileges granted to them under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution have been violated. More specifically, the amended complaint sets forth the following allegations:(a) HARP — (1) That defendants have beaten him, and that defendant Ragen made the statement, “I will kill you before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  3. Gordon v. GarrsonDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1948
  4. Sellers v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1946

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Charles A. L. Almond v. John E. Kent, Sheriff of Augusta County, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  3. Herman Jackson, Jr. v. James B. Godwin, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. Theodore X. A. Sewell v. Paul F. Pegelow, Etc., Joseph X. Watson v. Paul F. Pegelow, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  5. Fortune Society v. McGinnisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API