Clark v. Holchak
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Appellant has appealed from the trial court’s order dismissing his cause -of action after sustaining a special exception and denying appellant an opportunity to amend his pleadings. The denial of the right to amend was ordered since the co-urt found no amendment was possible that would assert a theory for a cause of action consistent with the written instrument sued upon and certain sworn admissions.
Appellant in his petition alleged that he was the owner of a one sixty-fourth royalty under a royalty contract that contained a clause stating:
“It is further agreed and herein…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garcia v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Morrison v. SwaimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Fleming v. AshcroftTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. HazlittTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Upshur County v. HeydrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holchak v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Bain v. StranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Clark v. HolchakTexas Supreme Court · 1953