Legal Opinion

Clark v. Holchak

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1952No. 12386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Appellant has appealed from the trial court’s order dismissing his cause -of action after sustaining a special exception and denying appellant an opportunity to amend his pleadings. The denial of the right to amend was ordered since the co-urt found no amendment was possible that would assert a theory for a cause of action consistent with the written instrument sued upon and certain sworn admissions.

Appellant in his petition alleged that he was the owner of a one sixty-fourth royalty under a royalty contract that contained a clause stating:

“It is further agreed and herein…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garcia v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Morrison v. SwaimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Fleming v. AshcroftTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. HazlittTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Upshur County v. HeydrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holchak v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Bain v. StranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Clark v. HolchakTexas Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API