Legal Opinion

State v. Cotton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2009No. ED 91528PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.

Today we are presented with the question of whether a criminal defendant waives his or her protest regarding the expiration of the statute of limitations by failing to raise the issue in the trial court. We answer in the affirmative. The defendant, Marvin Cotton, appeals from his conviction of forcible rape, forcible sodomy, and kidnapping. The defendant argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him for kidnapping because prosecution for that offense was barred by the statute of limitations and because he did not affirmatively waive the statute-of-limitations…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. Charles T. Walsh and Bowe, Walsh & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Claude C. Wild, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Jack B. KarlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. State of Missouri v. Maurice Parnell WebberMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI v. GARRY L. FILBECKMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State of Missouri v. Cale D. SeymourMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Akinbi v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API