Legal Opinion

O'Mary v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1931No. 14380PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for burglary of a railroad car; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant complains of the lack of testimony to show that he burglarized a railroad car, that being the allegation in the indictment. We find in the testimony of Brooks where he specifically refers to the car as a railroad car. The fact that he was an accomplice would make no difference. H. R. Church was the alleged owner of said railroad car, and the testimony shows that he was the agent at Sherman of the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, and that a certain train, in charge of a certain…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gulp, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Kelsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Lamb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Patterson v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Dyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Gill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Gill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API