Legal Opinion

H. D. Watts Co. v. American Bond & Mortgage Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 14, 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The declaration in each of these two actions of tort, which were tried together, contained two counts, the first of which was waived. Thé answer in each case was a general denial. They are before us on exceptions saved by the plaintiff to the admission and exclusion of evidence, at the close of which and subject to the plaintiff’s exception, the trial judge ordered a verdict for the defendants. The jury would have been warranted in finding the following facts:

The plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of Maryland, was engaged in the construction of buildings. On July 25, 1922, it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Lopes v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Dempsey v. ChambersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Commissioner of Banks v. Tremont Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. G.S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Falmouth Marine, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. National Merchandising Corp. v. LeydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Chemawa Country Golf, Inc. v. WnukMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Bethlehem Fabricators, Inc. v. H. D. Watts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. H. D. Watts Co. v. American Bond & Mortgage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API