Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. Campbell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided May 12, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, District Judge.

The bill of complaint alleges infringement of letters patent No. 726,293, granted to one John W. Howell, and assigned to the complainant. The defendant has demurred to the bill; assigning for cause that said patent is void, in law, for lack of patentable invention and novelty.

Various reasons have been given by the courts in justification of the practice of questioning the validity of a patent by a .demurrer, but it is unnecessary to refer to these, since the practice has long been thoroughly well established. It is likewise clearly well settled that a demurrer can be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western Electric Co. v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. American Fibre-Chamois Co. v. Buckskin-Fibre Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  3. Indurated Fibre Industries Co. v. GraceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1892
  4. Dick v. Oil Well Supply Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. Lyons v. DruckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krell Auto Grand Piano Co. v. Story & Clark Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  2. Lange v. McGuinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1910
  3. Malignani v. Hill-Wright Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1910
  4. Southern Plow Co. v. Atlanta Agricultural WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1908
  5. Jackes-Evans Mfg. Co. v. Hemp & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API