Legal Opinion
Respect Life S. San Francisco v. City of S.F.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided September 18, 2017No. A145992PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHumes, P.J.
*452The City of South San Francisco approved a conditional-use permit allowing an office building to be converted to a medical clinic for use by Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc. (Planned Parenthood), the real party in interest. The City determined that its consideration of the permit was categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq uitur (CEQA).1 Respect Life South San Francisco (Respect Life) and several individuals challenged the City's determination by petitioning for a writ of mandate in the trial court. The court denied the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. Bay Area Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Westlands Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- World Bus. Acad. v. Cal. State Lands Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Covina Residents for Responsible Dev. v. City of Covina, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Arcadians for Environmental Preservation v. City of ArcadiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Concerned Citizens of Beverly Hills etc. v. City of Beverly Hills CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Concerned Citizens of Beverly Hills/Bel Air v. City of Beverly Hills CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.