Herskovitz v. Baird
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gary, J., Charleston, April, 1900. Action for damages to personal and real property by Betty Herskovitz against W. J. and Isaac Baird. Judgment for plaintiff. Now trial ordered. Plaintiff appeals from latter order. cite: Rule XI., C. C. C.; 29 Minn., 357; 50 S. C., 425; 31 S. C., 510. cite: 14 S. C., 385; 1 Rich., 113; 4 Rich. Eq., 91; 20 S. C., 204; 47 S. C., 116; 26 S. C., 388; 50 S. C., 54; 46 S. C., 218; 31 S. €., 527; 39 S. C., 108.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This action was brought to recover damages to the real estate and personal property of the plaintiff, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $300 damages to the personal property. A motion was made upon the minutes of the Court for a new trial on the grounds set forth in the order of his Honor, the presiding Judge, which is as follows: “This is a motion made upon the minutes of the Court, to' set aside the verdict of the jury rendered in the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Willis v. West. Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Busbee v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911