Hopwood v. Voss
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYeager, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries by Pearl C. Hopwood, plaintiff and appellant, against George Voss, defendant and appellee. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, a corporation, and the City of Kearney, a municipal corporation, were made parties on account of their rights of subrogation in the event of recovery in damages by the plaintiff for payments made by them pursuant to the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Further mention of these parties will not be required. Hop-wood will be referred to hereinafter as plaintiff and Voss as defendant.
The case was tried to a jury and a verdict…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Murray Ex Rel. Murray v. Pearson Appliance StoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Shields v. County of BuffaloNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Anderson v. ByrdNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Corbitt v. Omaha Transit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Graves v. BednarNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McLaughlin v. HellbuschNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Satterfield v. WatlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1966