Legal Opinion

Former Employees of AST Research, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Labor

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 20, 2001No. Court 00-10-00481Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Eaton, Judge:

Plaintiffs seek judicial review of the United States Department of Labor’s (“Labor”) determination that they were ineligible for Trade Adjustment Assistance (“TAA”) benefits under the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2271-2322 (1994). The United States (“Government”), on behalf of Labor, moves, pursuant to USCIT R. 12(b)(1), to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the Government’s motion.

Background

Plaintiffs are former employees of AST Research, Inc. (“AST”) who, prior to their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Donna Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API