Former Employees of AST Research, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Labor
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Eaton, Judge:
Plaintiffs seek judicial review of the United States Department of Labor’s (“Labor”) determination that they were ineligible for Trade Adjustment Assistance (“TAA”) benefits under the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2271-2322 (1994). The United States (“Government”), on behalf of Labor, moves, pursuant to USCIT R. 12(b)(1), to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the Government’s motion.
Background
Plaintiffs are former employees of AST Research, Inc. (“AST”) who, prior to their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Donna Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.