Rule v. R. I. Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEYILACQUA, Chief Justice.
These two cases are petitions for writs of certiorari filed under the provisions of G.L. 1956 (1977 Reenactment) § 42-35-16, which petitions have been consolidated for argument because they present a cognate issue concerning the security and suspension requirements of the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act. 1 We shall refer to the plaintiffs, Paul Rule and Rose Sirenski, as “Rule” and “Sirenski” individually and as “plaintiffs” collectively. We shall refer to the defendants Registrar of Motor Vehicles and Department of Transportation as “the registrar.”
On…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Little v. Conflict of Interest CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Lewis v. Southmore Savings AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- August v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Sinclair v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fiske v. MacGregor, Division of BrunswickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Ayers-Schaffner v. SolomonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Craig v. PareSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Police & Firefighter's Retirement Ass'n of Providence v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- Amick v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.