Legal Opinion

Gormley v. Eison

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1939No. 13066PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

1. Petitioners base their right to prevail on the contention that the superintendent of banks, after having paid them the full amounts of their principal, is in duty bound to pay them interest on their general demand deposits. It was not alleged that the bank contracted to pay them interest, or that the fund in the hands of the superintendent of banks had produced interest. The bank in process of liquidation having paid all costs and expenses of liquidation, and having paid the principal amount of all claims of depositors and other creditors, and the superintendent of banks…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Western Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. American Casualty Insurance Company's CaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  4. Davis v. ArthurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Bond v. Central BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clark v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Ford Motor Company v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Wheeless v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Scocca v. WiltSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  5. City of Atlanta v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API