Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Sheppard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

Concededly, the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $900 for architectural Work. Plaintiff, being unable to collect from the defendant, asked her son Ferdinand to give him a couple of promissory notes that could be discounted at the bank, in reply to which the son stated that he would see his mother “ and talk it over.” A short time later the son reported to the plaintiff that he had seen the defendant and that he would give plaintiff two notes for $450 each, payable, respectively, sixty and ninety days after date. Such notes were executed by defendant’s son as the maker…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J. H. Lane & Co. v. United Oil Cloth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Held v. Caldwell-Easton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Froude v. FleischmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Healy v. BrotmanNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kinsella v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. S & L Paving Corp. v. MacMurray Tractor, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Sebert Manufacturing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Abby Financial Corp. v. AngelisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API