Legal Opinion

Dehmer v. Campbell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1933No. 23695PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

This is the second review of this case by this court. The earlier decision appears in 124 Ohio St., 634, 180 N. E., 267. However, the numerous questions now raised are wholly different from the one presented at that time.

It is the view of this court that among the present questions there' is but one requiring consideration. This relates to the second defense in the answer to the fourth amended petition. The substance of that allegation is that the plaintiff’s claimed right of action accrued more than one year before this suit was filed. Specifically, the defendant Dehmer contends that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Defiance Water Co. v. City of DefianceOhio Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Dehmer v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Cuyahoga Falls v. RobartOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Westbrook v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. City of Berea Ex Rel. Ward v. TrupoOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Allen v. Vill. of Walton Hills, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API