Legal Opinion

WINARSKE v. LAMMER

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided February 22, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00186Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION ADAM JOSEPH WINARSKE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 2:20-cv-00186-JMS-DLP ) B. LAMMER, ) ) Respondent. ) Order Denying Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

and Directing Entry of Final Judgment In 2012, petitioner Adam Winarske was convicted of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 924. He seeks relief from his conviction and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the following reasons, Mr. Winarske's habeas petition must be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. In Re James Davenport and Sherman NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Royce Brown v. John F. CarawayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API