Hatcher v. Edward D. Jones & Co., LP
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEARN, C.J.:
The issue presented here is whether a broadly-worded arbitration clause contained in an agreement for investment services should be applied to a lawsuit alleging the client’s funds were transferred electronically to a third party without his authorization or consent. We hold the claims relating to breach of the underlying agreement should be arbitrated but the claims for negligence and a violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (SCUTPA) are not subject to arbitration. Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Ricky Hatcher opened a Roth Individual…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Zabinski v. Bright Acres AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Long v. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Aiken v. World Finance Corp. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Thornton v. Trident Medical Center, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parsons v. John Wieland Homes & Neighborhoods of the Carolinas, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- Parsons v. John Wieland HomesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- Parsons v. John Wieland Homes & Neighborhoods of the Carolinas, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016