Legal Opinion

Hatcher v. Edward D. Jones & Co., LP

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 14, 2008No. 4431PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, C.J.:

The issue presented here is whether a broadly-worded arbitration clause contained in an agreement for investment services should be applied to a lawsuit alleging the client’s funds were transferred electronically to a third party without his authorization or consent. We hold the claims relating to breach of the underlying agreement should be arbitrated but the claims for negligence and a violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (SCUTPA) are not subject to arbitration. Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Ricky Hatcher opened a Roth Individual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Zabinski v. Bright Acres AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Long v. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  4. Aiken v. World Finance Corp. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Thornton v. Trident Medical Center, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parsons v. John Wieland Homes & Neighborhoods of the Carolinas, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  2. Parsons v. John Wieland HomesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  3. Parsons v. John Wieland Homes & Neighborhoods of the Carolinas, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API