Legal Opinion

Marik v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1987No. B026270PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINERMAN, P. J.

The issue in this original proceeding is whether an individual appointed by the court as a provisional director of a professional medical corporation must be a physician or other “licensed person” as that term is defined by Corporations Code sections 13401 and 13401.5. Petitioner Jaroslav Marik, M.D., objects to an order of the respondent court appointing a retired judge as provisional director of the Tyler Medical Clinic, a professional corporation, owned jointly by Dr. Marik and Dr. Stanley Friedman.

We conclude that the respondent court erred. The matter having been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. California Ass'n of Dispensing Opticians v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steinsmith v. Medical Board of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Atkins v. Rancho Physical Therapy CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1994
  4. Opinion No. (2000), California Attorney General Reports2000
  5. Opinion No. (2009), California Attorney General Reports2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API