Legal Opinion

Dolan v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 12, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Osceola District. Oourt. — Hon. Wm. Hutchinson, Judge. Action to recover damages for personal injury. There was an instructed verdict, and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.—

1Per curiam

The defendant’s answer consisted of a denial of the allegations of the petition and a plea of the statute of limitations; and the motion to direct a verdict in defendant’s favor was based upon the following grounds: (1) That no negligence had been shown on part of defendant, and it was affirmatively shown that plaintiff was guilty of negligence contributing to his own injury; and (2) that more than two years had elapsed after the alleged injury and before this action was begun. As the motion was sustained generally, we cannot- disturb the ruling, if the record is sufficient to sustain the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hearn v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Kern v. SanbornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Cooley v. MaineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API