Hoover v. Ehrsam Company
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harman, C.:
This is an appeal by an employee from a district court’s denial of a workmen’s compensation claim. The case turns upon whether, at the time of injury, claimant was removed from workmen’s compensation coverage by reason of doing work which he had been prohibited from performing.
Claimant Charles C. Hoover was an employee of respondent Ehrsam Company, a self-insurer, which company engaged in machine and foundry work, including the processing of sheet metal. Claimant started working for respondent in 1953 'after navy service which resulted in a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Newman v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Bartley v. C-H Riding Stables, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Hayes v. Ambassador Court, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kindel v. Ferco Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Wells v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
- Scott Ex Rel. Administrator v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Maintenance Management, Inc. v. TinkleColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Smith v. Husky Terminal Restr., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.