Legal Opinion

People v. Darcy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 10, 1974No. 59170PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

The defendant, Darcy, was convicted and adjudicated a delinquent for violating section 11—3 of the Criminal Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 38, sec. 11—3), to-wit:

“Any person of the age of 14 years and upwards who, by force or threat of force, compels any other person to perform or submit to any act of deviate sexual conduct commits deviate sexual assault.”

In the instant case, the State charges that on June 24, 1972, the defendant, by threat of force, compelled Anthony Quinlan to submit to a deviate sexual act.

The sole issue presented for review is whether the evidence established beyond a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The People v. FaulisiIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. The PEOPLE v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. The People v. QuallsIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  4. The PEOPLE v. DeFratesIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. The People v. ElderIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WalshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. People v. CastroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. People v. GiacintiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. People v. GramcAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. People v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API