Conneaut Lake Ice Co. v. Quigley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 143, Jan. T., 1909, by-plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Crawford Co., Sept. T., 1906, No. 1, dismissing bill in equity in case of Conneaut Lake Ice Company v. Amos C. Quigley et al. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Criswell, P. J., specially presiding. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Errors assigned (1-56) sufficiently appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Potter,
The Conneaut Lake Ice Company, a corporation, filed this bill in equity in the court of common pleas of Crawford county against Amos C. Quigley and H. E. Rhoads, in which it averred that it was the owner, and in possession of Conneaut Lake, the lands thereunder, and the waters thereof, and of the lands immediately adjoining and surrounding the lake; that as a consequence it had the exclusive right to control and navigate the waters of the lake, and to control the lands bordering upon it; that the defendants, who as tenants under it, held certain lands abutting on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Village of Pewaukee v. SavoyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mountain Properties, Inc. v. Tyler Hill Realty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Northway Village No. 3, Inc. v. Northway Properties, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Warren Sand & Gravel Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Livingston by Livingston v. Pa. Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Manchester Marble Co. v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.