Legal Opinion

McIlvaine v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 1990No. 88-2129PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MINER, Judge.

In this appeal, we review the trial court’s order granting summary final judgment in favor of defendant/appellee in a property dispute. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment appealed from.

By a Bill of Sale and Easement dated February 14, 1978, appellee, Florida East Coast Railway (“FEC”) acquired from Seaboard Coast Line Railway (“Seaboard”)

a certain segment of railroad trackage, to include ballast, grading, rail, angle bars, tie plates, drainage structures, fastenings, cross ties and other appurtenances, used in the construction of the said segment of trackage at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Humphreys v. McKissockSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Ansley v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Florida Power Corporation v. HicksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Wilson v. Ward Lumber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cheshire Hunt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  2. Cheshire Hunt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  3. Pathare v. GoolsbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API