Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 15, 1993No. 1-92-0062WCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rakowski

The appellee, William Rutledge (claimant), was employed as a surface grinder for Sargent-Welch Scientific Company (Sargent-Welch or employer) when he developed a work-related disability. The claimant accepted a lesser paying job in the employer’s stockroom, but later quit, moved to Michigan and worked part time. Subsequently, on arbitration, the claimant was awarded two-thirds of the difference between his average weekly wage as a surface grinder and his Michigan job pursuant to section 8(d)l of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (111. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 48, par. 138.8(d)(1)). The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Durfee v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Fritz Electric Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Smith v. Industrial Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Smith v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API