Frost v. State

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, James Randall Frost appeals his conviction on one count of theft by taking, contending that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; (2) the trial court erred in failing to grant his general demurrer to the indictment; and (3) there was a fatal variance between the method of committing theft by taking alleged in the indictment and the method proved at trial. For the reasons which follow, we affirm.

1. In his first enumeration of error, Frost contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We disagree.