Attea v. Attea
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Scudder, J.P., and Green, J. (dissenting in part).
We respectfully dissent in part. We agree with the majority that defendant has an obligation to pay for the disputed college expenses for the parties’ second youngest son. Thus, we would modify the order by granting that part of plaintiffs cross motion with respect to the educational expenses of the parties’ second youngest son. In our view, however, defendant has a further obligation to pay the medical school expenses incurred by the parties’ youngest son, and we therefore do not agree with the majority that the part of defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vetrano v. CalveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Schonour v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Guryn v. GurynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003