Legal Opinion

Cammack v. AVEMCO Insurance Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The primary issue is whether the loss of plaintiff’s airplane is covered by the insurance policy issued by defendant. The facts were introduced by stipulation, deposition, statement and affidavit. The trial court, sitting without a jury, held the loss was covered by insurance and the insurer appeals.

The plaintiff owned a Cessna 172 airplane. The policy provided coverage for the use of the plane for business and pleasure, “* * * but excluded (a)' instruction of any person not specified by name in item 10 below, or (b) any operation for which a charge is made.” Defendant contends the plane was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EzzellWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Christensen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. CristSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Casualty Co. of Redding v. Eagle Star Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Flagstaff Mortuary, Inc. v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. American Eagle Insurance v. Rutland Area Flyers, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1996
  4. Avemco Insurance Company v. Auburn Flying Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Avemco Insurance v. Auburn Flying Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API