Petroleum Carriers Corp. v. Summerlin
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SHANNON, Judge.
This is an appeal by the defendant below from an order granting a new trial. While the appellant poses three points in his brief, it is not necessary that we pass upon all of them. The court granted a new trial on the premise that one of the jurors, Richard J. Ramus, had unintentionally failed to disclose the fact that a claim had been previously made against him by one of the attorneys for the plaintiff. It appears from the record that Ramus was interrogated on voir dire examination, and the following questions and answers were given:
“Q. Are you acquainted with Mr. Waldo…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Loftin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Pearcy v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rouede Construction, Inc. v. First National Bank of Eau GallieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Drew v. CouchCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1986
- Kelly v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979