Legal Opinion

People v. Chambers

New York County Courts

Decided July 3, 1947PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The information is made on the personal knowledge of the informant. We can possibly infer that he did not have the personal knowledge he claims to have had, but nevertheless the information is sufficient on its face to invest the court with jurisdiction.

The defendant does not, by a plea of guilt, waive a jurisdictional defect in the information, as where the facts stated are insufficient to constitute a crime. (People v. Patrick, 175 Misc. 997; People v. Trudeau, 24 N. Y. S. 2d 34; People v. Rosenkrantz, 123 Misc. 335; People v. Tretneck, 175 Misc. 41.)

On the other hand, a plea of guilt is a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Patrick, New York County Courts1941
  2. People v. RosenkrantzNew York Court of Special Session · 1924
  3. People v. Sly, New York County Courts1942
  4. People ex rel. Travis v. Daniels, New York County Courts1943
  5. People v. Tretneck, New York County Courts1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. People ex rel. Brown v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. People v. Banner, New York County Courts1957
  4. People v. Smith, New York County Courts1962
  5. People v. Carney, New York County Courts1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API