Dean v. Paladin Exploration Co., Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Chief Judge.
{1} Plaintiffs filed suit against Defendants, seeking compensation for damages resulting from seismic operations conducted by Defendants on Plaintiffs’ property. Prior to trial, Defendants filed a motion to exclude evidence, seeking to preclude the introduction of any evidence related to “any payments made to Plaintiffs or any other person or entity for seismograph operations conducted upon any of Plaintiffs’ property.” Defendants contemporaneously filed a motion for summary judgment. As grounds for that motion, Defendants asserted that they were not contractually…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. WorleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. StanleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Pollock v. State Highway & Transportation DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Amoco Production Co. v. Carter Farms Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Ponce v. ButtsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McNeill v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Woody Investment, LLC v. Sovereign Eagle, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015