Legal Opinion

State v. Aures

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1942No. 6448PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Chief Justice.

The defendant, Jacob Aures, was convicted of embezzlement after trial by jury. He appeals.

Section 103-15-5, Revised Statutes of Utah, 1933, defines “embezzlement” as follows:

“Every person intrusted with any property as bailee, tenant or lodger, or with any power of attorney for the sale or transfer thereof who fraudulently converts the same, or the proceeds thereof, to his own use, or secretes it with a fraudulent intent to convert it to his own use, is guilty of embezzlement.”

Three points are before the court on this appeal. The first has reference to instructions to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TylerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Martin v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Stecher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People v. SchragerIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PendervilleUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State v. LaubUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State v. GeorgopoulosUtah Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API