Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Castleman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1904No. 20,262PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Erom Starke Circuit Court; T. F. Hoxoard, Special Judge. Action by Jacob A. Cannon against Andrew O. Castle-man. Erom. a judgment for defendant, plaintiii appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, C. J.

Appellant’s complaint in this action charges, in effect, that he was induced to enter into a contract with appellee through the fraud of the latter; that suit was afterward brought by appellee against appellant on said contract in a court of competent jurisdiction; that the cause was tried upon the complaint and a general denial, and resulted in a judgment for appellee, which was affirmed on appeal to the Appellate Court of this State; that appellant has been compelled to pay tho sum of $1,700 in the satisfaction of said judgment, and for u\penses in and about his defense. A demurrer was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Le Guen v. GouverneurCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1798
  4. Crosby v. JerolomanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Maynard v. WaidlichIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cattlemen'S Trust Co. v. BlasingameCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Lusk v. Porter, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Schaefer v. HinesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. McCray v. WhitneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Reichert v. McCoolIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API