Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 13, 1929No. 10639PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

— Offense, the unlawful possession of a forged instrument with the intent to pass the same as true; penalty, three years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record.

It is convincingly argued in a brief on file that the indictment exhibited in the transcript is insufficient to charge an offense. The prosecution was under Art. 998, P. C. (1925), which reads as follows:

“If any person shall knowingly have in his possession any instrument of writing, the making of which is by law an offense, with intent to use or pass the same as true, he…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Watts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Owen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Colbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API