Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Strong Arm Reservoir Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1960No. 8837PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

Appellants brought this action to enjoin respondents from interfering with their use of four cubic feet'per second free flow (natural flow) rights to á certain stream known as Battle Creek. Respondents assert these water rights claimed by appellants have been surrendered to its predecessor, the Strong Arm Reservoir Company.

Prior to 1898, the predecessors of Francis J. Armstrong irrigated from the free *481flow of Battle Creek, a tributary to Bear River. This being a small stream inadequate to supply sufficient water during the summer and fall months, Armstrong’s predecessors,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Jensen v. ChandlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Fuchs v. LloydIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Ryan v. WoodinIdaho Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. HavensIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Melton v. AmarIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Grover v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Jones v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Pern v. StocksIdaho Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API