Legal Opinion

The Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 8, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Herman A. Haft died testate leaving two policies of insurance upon his life. The policies had been issued by the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company and were made payable to the executors, administrators and assigns of the insured. The present appeal is from a final decree of the Circuit Court judicially construing the last will and testament of said Herman A. Haft insofar as it was asserted to be applicable to the disposition of the life insurance policies’ proceeds amounting to $7442.25 payable at the time of testator’s death.

The facts as disclosed by the transcript of record are in general…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tustin v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Milam v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Sloan v. SloanSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Maclean v. FisherSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  5. Scott v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of SeatonSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Dunbar H. Johnson, as of the Estate of Henry M. Remy, Deceased v. Edith H. RemyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. In re Estate of AlworthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. University Medical Center v. ZeilerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Ball v. Barnett Nat. Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API