Legal Opinion
Leandro Andrade v. Attorney General of the State of California Ernest B. Roe, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 2001No. 99-55691PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
270 F.3d 743 (9th Cir. 2001)
LEANDRO ANDRADE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; ERNEST B. ROE, WARDEN, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES.
No. 99-55691
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Argued and Submitted May 25, 2001
Filed November 2, 2001
[Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Erwin Chemerinsky, University of Southern California Law School, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioner-appellant.
Robert M. Foster, Deputy Attorney General, and Douglas P. Danzig, Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, California, for the respondents-appellees.
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lockyer, Attorney General of California v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002