Legal Opinion
Lowengart v. Lowengart
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 15, 2010No. 1091069PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOLIN, Justice.
Sanford P. Lowengart III seeks a writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to grant his Rule 12(b)(2), Ala. R. Civ. P., motion to dismiss him as a defendant in an action brought by Gloria Lowengart on the basis that the trial court lacks personal jurisdiction over him.
Facts and Procedural History
Gloria has been a resident of Alabama since 2000. Sanford, her son, lives in California and was employed by Cephus Capital Management LLC (“Cephus”), an investment-management company he founded, in 2007. According to Gloria, Sanford contacted her in September 2007 and asked her to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd. And Coastal Marketing Associates, Inc. And Schuman, Martin L., JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- John Madara v. Daryl HallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Robinson v. Giarmarco & Bill, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garrison Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. No. 1 Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- Carson v. Carson (Ex parte Carson)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017