Legal Opinion

Allen Park Theatre Co. v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1973No. Docket 14757PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

I agree that the insurance policy in this case can be read with complete logic to arrive at the result reached by Judge Fitzgerald. I am, however, compelled to say that the result reached in Sloan v Phoenix of Hartford Ins Co, 46 Mich *201App 46; 207 NW2d 434 (1973), is just as logically possible. Under these circumstances I am compelled to hold with the Sloan Court. If the insurer wanted to be sure that the payment of business-interruption benefits had to be accompanied by physical damage it was its burden to say so une-quivocally. Under the authority of Sloan the trial judge is affirmed.

V. J.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sloan v. Phoenix of Hartford InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United Airlines, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. Allen Park Theatre Co. v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Kelaher, Connell & Conner P.C. v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  4. Milan v. The Cincinnati Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  5. Rayshawn Pace v. John DoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API