Roman v. Wells Fargo Bank
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtLawson, J.
Daniel and Noemi Roman appeal from a summary final judgment of foreclosure in favor of Wells Fargo Bank. We affirm in all respects and write only to address the Romans’ argument that a genuine issue of material fact should have precluded summary judgment given their averment that they did not receive Wells Fargo’s notice of default. Because the express language of the mortgage only required that Wells Fargo mail notice, not that the Romans receive it,1 we reject the Romans’ argument. Wells Fargo established by affidavit that it mailed notice to the Romans as required by the mortgage. That is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coleman v. BAC ServicingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Griffin v. BiermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Jackson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martins v. PNC Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Green Tree Servicing LLC v. SankerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. OstranderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- MONICA GASCON AND ALEXIS SCHLOETER v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- Rosario v. PHH Mortgage Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.