Legal Opinion

Canfield v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 12, 1948No. 10555PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

On this petition for review, the taxpayer insists that the Tax Court erred in deciding that there is a deficiency due in his income tax for 1941 in the amount of $4,121.06, or in any other amount. The case presents the issue whether a husband and wife partnership agreement executed in writing on October 10, 1941, should be recognized for tax purposes as a partnership. The Tax Court, in the opinion of the majority, stated that the arrangement between petitioner and his wife seems to fall within the broad scope of the definition of the term “partnership” in Section 3797 of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Lawton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  3. Weizer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  4. Woosley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Le Sage v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  2. Shunk v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  3. Graber v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUECourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  4. Wenig v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  5. Walsh v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API