Legal Opinion

Gray v. Plummer

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1952No. 34259PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelt on, J.

The plaintiff in error contends that no consideration for the contract was sufficiently shown because the evidence failed to show that the dismissal of the bastardy proceedings was considered in the alleged making of the contract. While we think that the plaintiff’s testimony, “I dismissed the bastardy warrant on March 18, 1950, based upon John Gray’s promise to pay me $6 per week for the support of the child,” together with the other testimony and circumstances of the case, was sufficient evidence to authorize the jury to find that such was the consideration (see Jones v. Peterson, Lott &…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Napier v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Jones v. Peterson, Lott & PaulkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. City National Bank & Trust Co. v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Holton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Venable v. BlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Thorpe v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Stewart v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API