Legal Opinion

Yates v. Iams

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1853PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Harris. For the facts of this case see Tates v. Houston, 4 Tex. K., 433.

1Opinion of the Court

Hemphill, Cu. J.

This case was argued and submitted upon the same statement of facts as the suit in which the present appellant prosecuted an appeal from a judgment against him in favor of Sam Houston; which judgment was affirmed by the court. (4 Tex. R., 433.)

Both parties claim through John Iams, sen. Appellant claimed the land by purchase from John Iams, jun., and Ruth Iams, who, he alleges, are the only legitimate heirs of John Iams, sen., and he contends that the plaintiffs in this suit in the court helow, who are appellees im this court, are the illegitimate children of the said John…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Blunt v. Houston Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Kircher v. MurrayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas · 1893
  3. Clapp v. EngledowTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Glover v. McFaddinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  5. Bowmer v. HicksTexas Supreme Court · 1858

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API