Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Chrysler Motors Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 2, 1988No. 5-87-0647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvo

While servicing a United Parcel Service (UPS) van, Phillip J. Gillespie, a mechanic for UPS, injured his back when the hood of the van dropped on his back. Gillespie sued Chrysler Motors Corporation alleging that Chrysler supplied UPS with a defective hood hinge which broke and caused the hood to fall on Gillespie, resulting in his back injuries. The parties tried the case for three weeks before a jury. At the close of all of the evidence, the court directed a verdict in Gillespie’s favor, finding that the hinge was unreasonably dangerous. The case was submitted to the jury on the issue of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bullard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Reidelberger v. Highland Body Shop, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. J. L. Simmons Co. Ex Rel. Hartford Insurance Group v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Gillson v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Munjal v. Baird & Warner, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Forest Preserve District of Du Page County v. Brookwood Land VentureAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Advanced Concepts Chicago, Inc. v. CDW CorporationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API