Hansen v. Moore (In Re Hansen)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRANDT, Bankruptcy Judge.
After trial, the bankruptcy court entered judgment denying debtor Kimberly Hansen’s discharge under § 727(a) 2 . She timely moved for reconsideration, which the bankruptcy court denied. Thereafter, the bankruptcy court awarded the adversary plaintiffs $97,678.72 in attorneys’ fees as a sanction under FRCP 37, applicable via Rule 7037. Debtor timely appealed all three orders.
We conclude that,
• To the extent she preserved her objections, debtor has not shown the bankruptcy court considered inadmissible evidence, or that its findings of fact are clearly erroneous;
•…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Retz v. Samson (In Re Retz)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Khalil v. Developers Surety & Indemnity Co. (In Re Khalil)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hamerly v. Fifth Third Mortgage Co. (In Re J & M Salupo Development Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Hopkins v. Cerchione (In Re Cerchione)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Fadel v. DCB United LLC (In Re Fadel)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.