Legal Opinion

Massey-Harris Harvester Co. v. Freeze

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 31, 1929No. 75PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by appellant as assignee. A demurrer thereto was sustained and counsel for appellee argue that the trial court was not in error because (1) the claim assigned and sued on was a tort and tortious claims are not assignable in Kansas, where the assignment was made; (2) if the action was not ex delicto it was on a chose in action, and the assignor and defendant being both citizens and residents of Kansas the Federal court was without jurisdiction under the terms of section 41 of title 28, U. S. Code (28 USCA § 41):

“No District Court shall have…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erwin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Traer v. ClewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Bushnell v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Brown v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Deshler v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Lilienfeld's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  2. Le Mieux Bros. v. Tremont Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API