May Mantel Co. v. United States Blow-Pipe Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action on account. Before Judge Westmoreland. City court of Atlanta. January term, 1894.
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
1. The United States Blow-Pipe Company brought its action against the May Mantel Company on - an open account, in the statutory form, attaching a bill of particulars thereto. Subsequently the plaintiff offered to amend the declaration by setting out a written contract between it and the defendant, showing that the articles sued for in the bill of particulars had been agreed on in the written contract. The defendant objected to the amendment on the ground that it introduced a new cause of action, the suit having been brought on an open account and no reference being made to a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alabama Construction Co. v. Continental Car & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Pittman v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Gordy Tire Co. v. BulmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- International Harvester Co. of America v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Delaware Insurance v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908