Legal Opinion

Demmel v. Hammett

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 13, 1950No. 41597PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, C.

This is a suit by Hans and Anna M. Demmel to cancel certain deeds. The defendants are a lawyer, Evan H. Hammett, and his former wife, and Frances B. McKee and a corporation, Evan H. Hammett, Inc. Miss McKee was a “straw” party to one of the deeds and has no interest in this appeal. Nelson v. Hammett, (Mo.) 189 S. W. (2) 238. The corporation filed an answer in which it claimed to be an innocent purchaser for value of a one half interest .in the property but Mr. Hammett has handled the corporation’s affairs and for the purposes of this appeal is treated as standing in his shoes. 7 C.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bliss v. PrichardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Grayson v. WeddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Eoff v. IrvineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Davis v. KlineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  5. Bucher v. HohlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Terrydale Management Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Chandler v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Johnson Fare Box Co. v. C. L. Downey Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API