Legal Opinion

Heintzelman v. Brushtown Athletic Ass'n

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County

Decided February 3, 1989No. 87-S-802Published

1Opinion of the Court

SPICER, P.J.,

This action involves a claim for personal injury and a derivative claim for loss of consortium. In the discussion that follows, we ignore the derivative claim for purposes of simplifying issues. Plaintiffs’ complaint states he attended a baseball game on May 28, 1987, at an athletic held maintained by defendant. Although the alleges “the public was invited to attend upon payment of an admission by donation,” he does not contend that a charge was levied in exchange for *223permission to enter the land at that time. He alleges he hit his head on a board protruding from a ceiling over…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Livingston by Livingston v. Pa. Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Kopp v. R. S. Noonan, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Farley v. Township of Upper DarbyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Lowman v. Indiana Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Kniaz Et Vir v. Benton Boro.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API