Legal Opinion

State v. Paschal

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 2006No. 87433PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colleen Conway Cooney, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the trial court’s decision granting the motion to suppress filed by defendant-appellee, Willie Paschal. Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm.

{¶ 2} In 2005, Paschal was charged with drug possession. He moved to suppress the evidence found in his vehicle. The following evidence was presented at the suppression hearing.

{¶ 3} Officer Robles was patrolling the area of West 85th Street and Lorain Avenue because he had received numerous drug complaints in that area. At around 9:00 p.m., he observed two men…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Brunswick v. WareOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. KeithOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. ForesterOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API