State v. Paschal
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Colleen Conway Cooney, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the trial court’s decision granting the motion to suppress filed by defendant-appellee, Willie Paschal. Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm.
{¶ 2} In 2005, Paschal was charged with drug possession. He moved to suppress the evidence found in his vehicle. The following evidence was presented at the suppression hearing.
{¶ 3} Officer Robles was patrolling the area of West 85th Street and Lorain Avenue because he had received numerous drug complaints in that area. At around 9:00 p.m., he observed two men…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Brunswick v. WareOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. KeithOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. ForesterOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014